Who is better, Athapaththu or Holding?
Chamari Athapaththu leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Michael Holding — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Chamari Athapaththu and Michael Holding level at 87.5. Chamari Athapaththu leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Michael Holding leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Athapaththu wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Holding wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/chamari-athapaththu-vs-michael-holding
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Athapaththu leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇰 Athapaththu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 124 | 342 |
| 🇯🇲 Holding | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 122 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AthapaththuActive | HoldingRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ODI runs | 3,500 | — |
| T20I runs | 3,000 | — |
| Highest ODI score | 195 | — |
| Asia Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Career best ODI ranking | 2 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 249 |
| Tests played | — | 60 |
| Best innings figures | — | 8 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Test bowling average | — | 23.68 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 90 |
Chamari Athapaththu leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Michael Holding — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Holding scores higher on dominance, honours. Athapaththu leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Athapaththu: 87.5, Holding: 87.5.
Make your case for Athapaththu vs Holding. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.