Who is better, Athapaththu or Akram?
Chamari Athapaththu leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Wasim Akram — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chamari Athapaththu above Wasim Akram: 87.5 vs 87.4. Chamari Athapaththu leads on Peak, Statistics. Wasim Akram leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Athapaththu wins: Peak, Statistics
Akram wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/chamari-athapaththu-vs-wasim-akram
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Athapaththu leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇰 Athapaththu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 124 | 342 |
| 🇵🇰 Akram | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 393 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AthapaththuActive | AkramRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ODI runs | 3,500 | — |
| T20I runs | 3,000 | — |
| Highest ODI score | 195 | — |
| Asia Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Career best ODI ranking | 2 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 414 |
| ODI wickets | — | 502 |
| World Cups | — | 1 |
| Five-wicket hauls | — | 25 |
| Test bowling average | — | 23.62 |
| ODI hat-tricks | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 90 |
Chamari Athapaththu leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Wasim Akram — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Akram scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Athapaththu leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Athapaththu: 87.5, Akram: 87.4.
Make your case for Athapaththu vs Akram. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.