Who is better, Bailey or McDaniel?
Champ Bailey leads with a GOAT score of 89.8 against 89.8 for Randall McDaniel — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bailey vs McDaniel
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Champ Bailey and Randall McDaniel level at 89.8.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BaileyWinner
89.8Bailey wins: no category outright
McDaniel
89.8McDaniel wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/champ-bailey-vs-randall-mcdaniel
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Champ Bailey
89.8
Bailey leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Champ Bailey
2. Randall McDaniel
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Champ Bailey5 seasons played · career day 1,825334 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Randall McDaniel5 seasons played · career day 1,826334 touchdowns
0.0% vs Bailey at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Bailey | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 334 | 693 |
| 🇺🇸 McDaniel | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 256 | 693 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bailey89.8
McDaniel89.8
FAQ
Where does McDaniel beat Bailey?
McDaniel does not lead any of the five categories; Bailey is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Bailey vs McDaniel score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bailey: 89.8, McDaniel: 89.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bailey vs McDaniel. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.