GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Harper vs Maruyama

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MaruyamaWinner
83.0

Maruyama wins: Dominance, Statistics

Harper
82.9

Harper wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/chandler-harper-vs-shigeki-maruyama

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Shigeki Maruyama
83.0

Maruyama leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Three-time PGA Tour winner who shot 58 in US Open qualifying.

1. Shigeki Maruyama
83.0
2. Chandler Harper
82.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇯🇵 Shigeki Maruyama5 seasons played · career day 2,191132 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Chandler Harper5 seasons played · career day 3,28678 wins
-40.9% vs Maruyama at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Harper00002878
🇯🇵 Maruyama0004094174

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHarperRetiredMaruyamaRetired
PGA Championships1
PGA Tour wins73
Ryder Cup appearances1
Career years32
Lowest 72-hole score at the time259
Japan Golf Tour wins10
Presidents Cup appearances3
Lowest competitive round58
Highest world ranking9
Dominance w25%7478
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8886
Honours w20%7874
Statistics w15%8890

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Maruyama83.0
Harper82.9
The people
Harper
Maruyama

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Harper vs Maruyama. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →