Who is better, Chang or Cotto?
Chang Jung-koo leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Miguel Cotto — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Chang vs Cotto
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Chang Jung-koo and Miguel Cotto level at 87.8. Chang Jung-koo leads on Dominance, Statistics. Miguel Cotto leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChangWinner
87.8Chang wins: Dominance, Statistics
Cotto
87.8Cotto wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/chang-jung-koo-vs-miguel-cotto
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Chang Jung-koo
87.8
Chang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Chang Jung-koo
2. Miguel Cotto
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇰🇷 Chang Jung-koo5 years played · career day 1,826314 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇷 Miguel Cotto5 years played · career day 1,825299 title wins
-4.8% vs Chang at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Chang | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 234 | 656 |
| 🇵🇷 Cotto | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 299 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Chang87.8
Cotto87.8
FAQ
Where does Cotto beat Chang?
Cotto scores higher on longevity. Chang leads on dominance, statistics.
How is the Chang vs Cotto score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chang: 87.8, Cotto: 87.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Chang vs Cotto. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.