Who is better, Chang or Son?
Chang Jung-koo leads with a cross-sport score of 84.3 against 80.7 for Son Heung-min — a gap of 3.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chang Jung-koo above Son Heung-min: 84.3 vs 80.7. Chang Jung-koo leads on Honours, Statistics, Dominance. Son Heung-min leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Son wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/chang-jung-koo-vs-son-heung-min
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
87.8 in-sport × 0.96 Global participation & competition depth
Chang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Chang — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | ChangRetired | SonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 85 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 65 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 84 |
| Title defences | 15 | — |
| Career wins | 38 | — |
| Knockouts | 17 | — |
| World title reigns | 2 | — |
| Career losses | 4 | — |
| Premier League goals | — | 127 |
| South Korea caps | — | 129 |
| South Korea goals | — | 50 |
| Asian Games gold medals | — | 1 |
| Europa League titles | — | 1 |
Chang Jung-koo leads with a cross-sport score of 84.3 against 80.7 for Son Heung-min — a gap of 3.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Son scores higher on longevity. Chang leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Each in-sport GOAT score is multiplied by Competition Depth: Chang 0.96 (boxing) and Son 1.00 (football). Deeper, more global sports keep more of their score.
Make your case for Chang vs Son. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.