Who is better, Hyatt or Free?
World B. Free leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.7 for Charley Hyatt — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks World B. Free above Charley Hyatt: 79.9 vs 79.7. World B. Free leads on Longevity, Statistics. Charley Hyatt leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Free wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hyatt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/charley-hyatt-vs-world-b-free
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Free leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hyatt | 0 | 0 | 12 | 26 | 56 | 96 |
| 🇺🇸 Free | 0 | 0 | 8 | 24.3 | 99 | 188.7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HyattRetired | FreeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-American selections | 3 | — |
| National titles | 2 | — |
| College career points | 852 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| All-Star selections | — | 1 |
| Career points | — | 17,955 |
| Career points per game | — | 20.3 |
| Best season scoring average | — | 30.2 |
| Seasons over 20 points per game | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
World B. Free leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.7 for Charley Hyatt — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hyatt scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Free leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hyatt: 79.7, Free: 79.9.
Make your case for Hyatt vs Free. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.