GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Conacher vs Fredrickson

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConacherWinner
87.1

Conacher wins: Dominance, Peak

Fredrickson
87.0

Fredrickson wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/charlie-conacher-vs-frank-fredrickson

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Charlie Conacher
87.1

Conacher leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Five-time NHL goal-scoring leader and a Stanley Cup winner with Toronto.

1. Charlie Conacher
87.1
2. Frank Fredrickson
87.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇨🇦 Frank Fredrickson5 seasons played · career day 1,826410 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Charlie Conacher5 seasons played · career day 1,825390 points
-4.9% vs Fredrickson at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Conacher0060129390717
🇨🇦 Fredrickson0060156331671

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricConacherRetiredFredricksonRetired
NHL goal-scoring titles5
Stanley Cups1
NHL goals225
NHL points398
All-Star selections5
Olympic gold medals1
Goals at the 1920 Olympics12
Career NHL points78
Seasons played11
Western league scoring titles1
Dominance w25%8886
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7680
Honours w20%8888
Statistics w15%9090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Conacher87.1
Fredrickson87.0
The people
Conacher
Fredrickson

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Conacher vs Fredrickson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →