Who is better, Gardiner or Goulet?
Charlie Gardiner leads with a GOAT score of 87.1 against 87.1 for Michel Goulet — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Charlie Gardiner and Michel Goulet level at 87.1. Charlie Gardiner leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Michel Goulet leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gardiner wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Goulet wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/charlie-gardiner-vs-michel-goulet
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gardiner leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Gardiner | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 363 | 579 |
| 🇨🇦 Goulet | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 327 | 685 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GardinerRetired | GouletRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 1 | — |
| Vezina Trophies | 2 | — |
| Career shutouts | 42 | — |
| Goals-against average | 2 | — |
| All-star selections | 4 | — |
| Career goals | — | 548 |
| Career points | — | 1,152 |
| 50-goal seasons | — | 4 |
| All-Star selections | — | 5 |
| Games played | — | 1,089 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Charlie Gardiner leads with a GOAT score of 87.1 against 87.1 for Michel Goulet — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Goulet scores higher on statistics, longevity. Gardiner leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gardiner: 87.1, Goulet: 87.1.
Make your case for Gardiner vs Goulet. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.