GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Labonté vs Sawchuk

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LabontéWinner
89.6

Labonté wins: Peak, Honours

Sawchuk
89.4

Sawchuk wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/charline-labonte-vs-terry-sawchuk

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Charline Labonté
89.6

Labonté leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Four Olympic golds in goal for Canada between 2002 and 2014.

1. Charline Labonté
89.6
2. Terry Sawchuk
89.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇨🇦 Terry Sawchuk5 seasons played · career day 2,92156 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Charline Labonté5 seasons played · career day 2,92145 points
-19.6% vs Sawchuk at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Labonté00001456
🇨🇦 Sawchuk00002368

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLabontéRetiredSawchukRetired
Olympic golds4
World Championship golds2
Olympic appearances4
CWHL Clarkson Cups3
Canada caps82
Stanley Cups4
Vezina Trophies4
Career shutouts103
Career wins445
Games played971
Dominance w25%8888
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%8890
Honours w20%9288
Statistics w15%8892

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Labonté89.6
Sawchuk89.4
The people
Labonté
Sawchuk

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Labonté vs Sawchuk. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →