Who is better, Bonnet or Vollmer?
Charlotte Bonnet leads with a GOAT score of 80.9 against 80.9 for Dana Vollmer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Charlotte Bonnet and Dana Vollmer level at 80.9. Charlotte Bonnet leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Dana Vollmer leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bonnet wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Vollmer wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/charlotte-bonnet-vs-dana-vollmer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bonnet leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Bonnet | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 24 |
| 🇺🇸 Vollmer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BonnetActive | VollmerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European golds | 4 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| French records | 5 | — |
| 200 m freestyle best | 154.44 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 5 |
| Olympic medals | — | 7 |
| World Championship golds | — | 8 |
| World records | — | 2 |
| 100 m butterfly best (s) | — | 55.98 |
| Pan Pacific golds | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Charlotte Bonnet leads with a GOAT score of 80.9 against 80.9 for Dana Vollmer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vollmer scores higher on dominance, honours. Bonnet leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bonnet: 80.9, Vollmer: 80.9.
Make your case for Bonnet vs Vollmer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.