Who is better, Edwards or Vettori?
Charlotte Edwards leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Daniel Vettori — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Charlotte Edwards and Daniel Vettori level at 87.0. Charlotte Edwards leads on Honours, Dominance. Daniel Vettori leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Edwards wins: Dominance, Honours
Vettori wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/charlotte-edwards-vs-daniel-vettori
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Edwards leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Edwards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 40 |
| 🇳🇿 Vettori | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 48 | 208 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EdwardsRetired | VettoriRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| International runs | 10,273 | — |
| International centuries | 9 | — |
| England caps | 309 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 362 |
| Test runs | — | 4,531 |
| ODI wickets | — | 305 |
| Tests played | — | 113 |
| Five-wicket hauls | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 94 |
Charlotte Edwards leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Daniel Vettori — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vettori scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Edwards leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Edwards: 87.0, Vettori: 87.0.
Make your case for Edwards vs Vettori. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.