GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Edwards vs Lanning

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LanningWinner
88.7

Lanning wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Edwards
87.0

Edwards wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/charlotte-edwards-vs-meg-lanning

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Meg Lanning
88.7

Lanning leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Seven World Cups as captain — the most successful skipper in the sport.

1. Meg Lanning
88.7
2. Charlotte Edwards
87.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Meg Lanning5 years played · career day 2,190277 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Charlotte Edwards5 years played · career day 2,19122 runs
-92.1% vs Lanning at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Edwards00031240
🇦🇺 Lanning00045217472

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricEdwardsRetiredLanningRetired
World Cup titles17
T20 World Cup titles1
International runs10,2738,352
International centuries9
England caps309
ODI centuries15
ODI average53.51
Commonwealth golds1
Wins as captain150
Dominance w25%8488
Peak w20%8892
Longevity w20%9082
Honours w20%8692
Statistics w15%8890

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Lanning88.7
Edwards87.0
The people
Edwards
Lanning

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Edwards vs Lanning. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →