GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hooper vs Baggio

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HooperWinner
85.0

Hooper wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Baggio
84.9

Baggio wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/charmaine-hooper-v-vs-baggio

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Charmaine Hooper
85.0

Hooper leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Canada's pioneering striker and a World Cup semi-finalist in 2003.

1. Charmaine Hooper
85.0
2. Roberto Baggio
84.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇨🇦 Charmaine Hooper5 seasons played · career day 1,825286 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Roberto Baggio5 seasons played · career day 3,28659 goals
-79.4% vs Hooper at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Hooper0050104286578
🇮🇹 Baggio0000559

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHooperRetiredBaggioRetired
Canada caps129
Canada goals71
World Cup appearances4
W-League titles2
Career club goals150
Career goals318
Ballon d'Or1
Serie A titles2
UEFA Cups1
International caps56
International goals27
Dominance w25%8284
Peak w20%8988
Longevity w20%8684
Honours w20%8083
Statistics w15%9086

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hooper85.0
Baggio84.9
The people
Hooper
Baggio

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hooper vs Baggio. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →