Who is better, Billups or McClain?
Katrina McClain leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.4 for Chauncey Billups — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Katrina McClain above Chauncey Billups: 86.5 vs 86.4. Katrina McClain leads on Honours, Dominance. Chauncey Billups leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McClain wins: Dominance, Honours
Billups wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/chauncey-billups-vs-katrina-mcclain
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McClain leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Billups | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 280 | 635 |
| 🇺🇸 McClain | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 342 | 676 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BillupsRetired | McClainRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA championships | 1 | — |
| Finals MVP awards | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 5 | — |
| Career assists | 5,445 | — |
| Free-throw percentage | 89 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| USA Basketball Player of the Year awards | — | 3 |
| Rebounds per game at 1996 Games | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
Katrina McClain leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.4 for Chauncey Billups — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Billups scores higher on longevity. McClain leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Billups: 86.4, McClain: 86.5.
Make your case for Billups vs McClain. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.