GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chen vs Carrington

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChenWinner
78.1

Chen wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Carrington
77.7

Carrington wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/chen-szu-yu-vs-jack-carrington

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇹🇼 Chen Szu-yu
78.1

Chen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Asian Games medallist and a long-serving Chinese Taipei number one.

1. Chen Szu-yu
78.1
2. Jack Carrington
77.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇹🇼 Chen Szu-yu5 seasons played · career day 2,55624 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Jack Carrington5 seasons played · career day 2,55616 titles
-33.3% vs Chen at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇹🇼 Chen0000737
🇬🇧 Carrington0000922

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChenActiveCarringtonRetired
Asian Games medals2
Olympic appearances3
World Tour medals5
Career-high world ranking15
World Championship appearances76
England caps70
English national medals4
Coaching books written8
Career span in years21
Dominance w25%7068
Peak w20%8684
Longevity w20%8286
Honours w20%7272
Statistics w15%8482

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chen78.1
Carrington77.7
The people
Chen
Carrington

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chen vs Carrington. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →