GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chiang vs Joo

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChiangWinner
81.9

Chiang wins: Statistics

Joo
81.8

Joo wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/chiang-peng-lung-vs-joo-sae-hyuk

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇹🇼 Chiang Peng-lung
81.9

Chiang leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Asian Games medallist and long-time Taiwanese international.

1. Chiang Peng-lung
81.9
2. Joo Sae-hyuk
81.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇰🇷 Joo Sae-hyuk5 seasons played · career day 1,825330 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇹🇼 Chiang Peng-lung5 seasons played · career day 1,826294 titles
-10.9% vs Joo at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇹🇼 Chiang0050104226610
🇰🇷 Joo0050108330684

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChiangRetiredJooRetired
Asian Games medals2
Olympic appearances2
World Championship appearances6
National titles4
ITTF tour medals5
World Championship medals2
Olympic medals1
Asian Games golds1
Career high world ranking4
Years at the top level22
Dominance w25%7676
Peak w20%8686
Longevity w20%8688
Honours w20%7880
Statistics w15%8680

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chiang81.9
Joo81.8
The people
Chiang
Joo

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chiang vs Joo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →