Who is better, Hafey or Flick?
Chick Hafey leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.0 for Elmer Flick — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hafey vs Flick
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chick Hafey above Elmer Flick: 83.1 vs 83.0. Chick Hafey leads on Honours. Elmer Flick leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HafeyWinner
83.1Hafey wins: Honours
Flick
83.0Flick wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BaseballShareable URL · /compare/chick-hafey-vs-elmer-flick
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Chick Hafey
83.1
Hafey leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Chick Hafey
2. Elmer Flick
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Elmer Flick5 seasons played · career day 1,8241.6 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Chick Hafey5 seasons played · career day 1,8261.5 home runs
-6.3% vs Flick at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hafey | 0 | 0 | 0.253 | 0.555 | 1.155 | 2.859 |
| 🇺🇸 Flick | 0 | 0 | 0.302 | 0.644 | 1.641 | 3.165 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hafey83.1
Flick83.0
FAQ
Where does Flick beat Hafey?
Flick scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hafey leads on honours.
How is the Hafey vs Flick score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hafey: 83.1, Flick: 83.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hafey vs Flick. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.