Who is better, Johnson or Tumba?
Sven Tumba leads with a GOAT score of 86.0 against 85.9 for Ching Johnson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Johnson vs Tumba
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sven Tumba above Ching Johnson: 86.0 vs 85.9. Sven Tumba leads on Dominance. Ching Johnson leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
TumbaWinner
86.0Tumba wins: Dominance
Johnson
85.9Johnson wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/ching-johnson-vs-sven-tumba
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Sven Tumba
86.0
Tumba leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Sven Tumba
2. Ching Johnson
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Ching Johnson5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Sven Tumba5 seasons played · career day 2,190112 points
-65.6% vs Johnson at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 672 |
| 🇸🇪 Tumba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 82 | 199 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Tumba86.0
Johnson85.9
FAQ
Where does Johnson beat Tumba?
Johnson scores higher on honours. Tumba leads on dominance.
How is the Johnson vs Tumba score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 85.9, Tumba: 86.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Johnson vs Tumba. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.