Who is better, Kelly or Boniperti?
Chloe Kelly leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Giampiero Boniperti — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chloe Kelly above Giampiero Boniperti: 85.7 vs 85.6. Chloe Kelly leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance. Giampiero Boniperti leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kelly wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Boniperti wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/chloe-kelly-v-vs-giampiero-boniperti
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kelly leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Kelly | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 332 | 694 |
| 🇮🇹 Boniperti | 0 | 0 | 8 | 35 | 94 | 149 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KellyActive | BonipertiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Euro final goals | 1 | — |
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| England caps | 60 | — |
| England goals | 15 | — |
| Serie A titles | — | 5 |
| Juventus goals | — | 178 |
| Serie A top scorer awards | — | 1 |
| Italy caps | — | 38 |
| Juventus appearances | — | 469 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Chloe Kelly leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Giampiero Boniperti — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boniperti scores higher on statistics, longevity. Kelly leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kelly: 85.7, Boniperti: 85.6.
Make your case for Kelly vs Boniperti. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.