GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Cho vs Wang Hao

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Wang HaoWinner
76.7

Wang Hao wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours

Cho
75.8

Cho wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/cho-dae-seong-vs-wang-hao

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Wang Hao
76.7

Wang Hao leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Three Olympic singles finals and three World Cup titles.

1. Wang Hao
76.7
2. Cho Dae-seong
75.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇰🇷 Cho Dae-seong5 seasons played · career day 2,556319 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Hao5 seasons played · career day 3,65131 titles
-90.3% vs Cho at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇰🇷 Cho0000200361
🇨🇳 Wang Hao0000023

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChoActiveWang HaoRetired
World Championship team medals2
Asian Games medals2
World Tour medals3
Career highest world ranking20
National team seasons9
World Championship singles titles1
World Cup titles3
Olympic medals4
World team titles6
Months at No. 130
ITTF Tour titles18
Dominance w25%7074
Peak w20%8480
Longevity w20%7276
Honours w20%7478
Statistics w15%8276

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Wang Hao76.7
Cho75.8
The people
Cho
Wang Hao

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Cho vs Wang Hao. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →