Who is better, Cavanaugh or Babashoff?
Chris Cavanaugh leads with a GOAT score of 72.6 against 71.4 for Jack Babashoff — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chris Cavanaugh above Jack Babashoff: 72.6 vs 71.4. Chris Cavanaugh leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cavanaugh wins: Longevity, Honours
Babashoff wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/chris-cavanaugh-vs-jack-babashoff
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cavanaugh leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cavanaugh | 0 | 0 | 60 | 132 | 304 | 544 |
| 🇺🇸 Babashoff | 0 | 0 | 62 | 136 | 398 | 466 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CavanaughRetired | BabashoffRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World records in relays | 1 | — |
| Pan American Games medals | 2 | — |
| US national podiums | 4 | 3 |
| Olympic Games contested | 1 | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Personal best 100 m free (s) | — | 50.81 |
| NCAA podiums | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 72 | 72 |
Chris Cavanaugh leads with a GOAT score of 72.6 against 71.4 for Jack Babashoff — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Babashoff does not lead any of the five categories; Cavanaugh is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cavanaugh: 72.6, Babashoff: 71.4.
Make your case for Cavanaugh vs Babashoff. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.