Who is better, Eubank or Persoon?
Delfine Persoon leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.9 for Chris Eubank — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Eubank vs Persoon
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Delfine Persoon above Chris Eubank: 83.0 vs 82.9. Delfine Persoon leads on Longevity. Chris Eubank leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
PersoonWinner
83.0Persoon wins: Longevity
Eubank
82.9Eubank wins: Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/chris-eubank-vs-delfine-persoon
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇪 Delfine Persoon
83.0
Persoon leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Delfine Persoon
2. Chris Eubank
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Chris Eubank5 years played · career day 1,82524 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇪 Delfine Persoon5 years played · career day 1,82524 title wins
0.0% vs Eubank at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Eubank | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 24 | 39 |
| 🇧🇪 Persoon | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 24 | 37 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Persoon83.0
Eubank82.9
FAQ
Where does Eubank beat Persoon?
Eubank scores higher on peak, statistics. Persoon leads on longevity.
How is the Eubank vs Persoon score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Eubank: 82.9, Persoon: 83.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Eubank vs Persoon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.