Who is better, Eubank or Haney?
Chris Eubank leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.9 for Devin Haney — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Eubank vs Haney
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Chris Eubank and Devin Haney level at 82.9. Chris Eubank leads on Longevity. Devin Haney leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
EubankWinner
82.9Eubank wins: Longevity
Haney
82.9Haney wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/chris-eubank-vs-devin-haney
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Chris Eubank
82.9
Eubank leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Chris Eubank
2. Devin Haney
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Chris Eubank5 years played · career day 1,82524 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Devin Haney5 years played · career day 1,82521 title wins
-12.5% vs Eubank at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Eubank | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 24 | 39 |
| 🇺🇸 Haney | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Eubank82.9
Haney82.9
FAQ
Where does Haney beat Eubank?
Haney scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Eubank leads on longevity.
How is the Eubank vs Haney score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Eubank: 82.9, Haney: 82.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Eubank vs Haney. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.