Who is better, Eubank or Hatton?
Chris Eubank leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.9 for Ricky Hatton — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Eubank vs Hatton
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Chris Eubank and Ricky Hatton level at 82.9. Chris Eubank leads on Honours. Ricky Hatton leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
EubankWinner
82.9Eubank wins: Honours
Hatton
82.9Hatton wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/chris-eubank-vs-ricky-hatton
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Chris Eubank
82.9
Eubank leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Chris Eubank
2. Ricky Hatton
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Ricky Hatton5 years played · career day 1,82529 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Chris Eubank5 years played · career day 1,82524 title wins
-17.2% vs Hatton at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Eubank | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 24 | 39 |
| 🇬🇧 Hatton | 0 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 29 | 40 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Eubank82.9
Hatton82.9
FAQ
Where does Hatton beat Eubank?
Hatton scores higher on peak. Eubank leads on honours.
How is the Eubank vs Hatton score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Eubank: 82.9, Hatton: 82.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Eubank vs Hatton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.