Who is better, Gayle or Taylor?
Chris Gayle leads with a GOAT score of 89.6 against 89.6 for Sarah Taylor — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gayle vs Taylor
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Chris Gayle and Sarah Taylor level at 89.6. Chris Gayle leads on Longevity. Sarah Taylor leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GayleWinner
89.6Gayle wins: Longevity
Taylor
89.6Taylor wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/chris-gayle-vs-sarah-taylor
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇲 Chris Gayle
89.6
Gayle leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Chris Gayle
2. Sarah Taylor
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Sarah Taylor5 years played · career day 1,825188 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇲 Chris Gayle5 years played · career day 2,55623 runs
-87.8% vs Taylor at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Gayle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 34 |
| 🇬🇧 Taylor | 0 | 0 | 26 | 58 | 188 | 408 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gayle89.6
Taylor89.6
FAQ
Where does Taylor beat Gayle?
Taylor scores higher on honours. Gayle leads on longevity.
How is the Gayle vs Taylor score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gayle: 89.6, Taylor: 89.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gayle vs Taylor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.