Who is better, Gayle or Waqar?
Waqar Younis leads with a GOAT score of 89.8 against 89.6 for Chris Gayle — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gayle vs Waqar
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Waqar Younis above Chris Gayle: 89.8 vs 89.6. Waqar Younis leads on Dominance, Peak. Chris Gayle leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WaqarWinner
89.8Waqar wins: Dominance, Peak
Gayle
89.6Gayle wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/chris-gayle-vs-waqar-younis
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Waqar Younis
89.8
Waqar leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Waqar Younis
2. Chris Gayle
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇵🇰 Waqar Younis5 years played · career day 2,190174 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇲 Chris Gayle5 years played · career day 2,55623 runs
-86.8% vs Waqar at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Gayle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 34 |
| 🇵🇰 Waqar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 147 | 264 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Waqar89.8
Gayle89.6
FAQ
Where does Gayle beat Waqar?
Gayle scores higher on longevity. Waqar leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Gayle vs Waqar score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gayle: 89.6, Waqar: 89.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gayle vs Waqar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.