Who is better, Webber or Friedman?
Chris Webber leads with a GOAT score of 77.8 against 77.7 for Marty Friedman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chris Webber above Marty Friedman: 77.8 vs 77.7. Chris Webber leads on Statistics, Peak. Marty Friedman leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Webber wins: Peak, Statistics
Friedman wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/chris-webber-vs-marty-friedman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Webber leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Webber | 0 | 0 | 17.5 | 37.6 | 103.3 | 199.4 |
| 🇺🇸 Friedman | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 345 | 709 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WebberRetired | FriedmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 5 | — |
| All-NBA first teams | 1 | — |
| Points per game | 20.7 | — |
| Rebounds per game | 9.8 | — |
| Rebounding titles | 1 | — |
| Professional league titles | — | 4 |
| Hall of Fame induction | — | 1,972 |
| Professional seasons | — | 18 |
| Inter-Allied Games golds | — | 1 |
| Years at the top level | — | 18 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 72 |
Chris Webber leads with a GOAT score of 77.8 against 77.7 for Marty Friedman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Friedman scores higher on honours, longevity. Webber leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Webber: 77.8, Friedman: 77.7.
Make your case for Webber vs Friedman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.