Who is better, Vieri or Eriksson?
Christian Vieri leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.1 for Magdalena Eriksson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Christian Vieri above Magdalena Eriksson: 80.2 vs 80.1. Christian Vieri leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Magdalena Eriksson leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Vieri wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Eriksson wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/christian-vieri-vs-magdalena-eriksson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Vieri leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Vieri | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 76 |
| 🇸🇪 Eriksson | 0 | 0 | 10 | 26 | 89 | 179 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VieriRetired | ErikssonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Serie A top scorer awards | 1 | — |
| Serie A goals | 142 | — |
| Italy caps | 49 | — |
| Italy goals | 23 | — |
| World Cup goals | 9 | — |
| Women's Super League titles | — | 4 |
| FA Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| Sweden caps | — | 100 |
| World Cup bronze medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 76 |
Christian Vieri leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.1 for Magdalena Eriksson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Eriksson scores higher on honours, longevity. Vieri leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Vieri: 80.2, Eriksson: 80.1.
Make your case for Vieri vs Eriksson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.