Who is better, Albers or Scarfiotti?
Ludovico Scarfiotti leads with a GOAT score of 69.3 against 68.4 for Christijan Albers — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ludovico Scarfiotti above Christijan Albers: 69.3 vs 68.4. Ludovico Scarfiotti leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Christijan Albers leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Scarfiotti wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Albers wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/christijan-albers-vs-ludovico-scarfiotti
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Scarfiotti leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Albers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| 🇮🇹 Scarfiotti | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlbersRetired | ScarfiottiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix starts | 46 | 10 |
| DTM race wins | 5 | — |
| Best Grand Prix finish | 5 | — |
| Career championship points | 4 | — |
| Professional years | 18 | — |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 1 |
| Podiums | — | 2 |
| European Hillclimb titles | — | 2 |
| Le Mans wins | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 56 | 64 |
| Peak w20% | 74 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 56 | 62 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Ludovico Scarfiotti leads with a GOAT score of 69.3 against 68.4 for Christijan Albers — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Albers scores higher on statistics, longevity. Scarfiotti leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Albers: 68.4, Scarfiotti: 69.3.
Make your case for Albers vs Scarfiotti. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.