Who is better, Albers or Liuzzi?
Christijan Albers leads with a GOAT score of 68.4 against 68.2 for Vitantonio Liuzzi — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Christijan Albers above Vitantonio Liuzzi: 68.4 vs 68.2. Christijan Albers leads on Longevity, Statistics. Vitantonio Liuzzi leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Albers wins: Longevity, Statistics
Liuzzi wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/christijan-albers-vs-vitantonio-liuzzi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Albers leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Albers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| 🇮🇹 Liuzzi | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlbersRetired | LiuzziRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix starts | 46 | — |
| DTM race wins | 5 | — |
| Best Grand Prix finish | 5 | — |
| Career championship points | 4 | — |
| Professional years | 18 | — |
| Grands Prix entered | — | 80 |
| Career points | — | 26 |
| Formula 3000 titles | — | 1 |
| Best race finish | — | 6 |
| Seasons in Formula 1 | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 56 | 58 |
| Peak w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 56 | 60 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Christijan Albers leads with a GOAT score of 68.4 against 68.2 for Vitantonio Liuzzi — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Liuzzi scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Albers leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Albers: 68.4, Liuzzi: 68.2.
Make your case for Albers vs Liuzzi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.