Who is better, Amertil or Andant?
Christine Amertil leads with a GOAT score of 77.6 against 77.5 for Téo Andant — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Christine Amertil above Téo Andant: 77.6 vs 77.5. Christine Amertil leads on Longevity, Statistics. Téo Andant leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Amertil wins: Longevity, Statistics
Andant wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/christine-amertil-vs-teo-andant
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Amertil leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇸 Amertil | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 153.6 | 354.98 |
| 🇫🇷 Andant | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 348 | 609 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AmertilRetired | AndantActive |
|---|---|---|
| World indoor medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic finals | 1 | — |
| 400 m best | 49.98 | — |
| National records | 1 | — |
| Olympic Games | 3 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 2 |
| French titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| Personal best (s) | — | 44.86 |
| European under-23 medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Christine Amertil leads with a GOAT score of 77.6 against 77.5 for Téo Andant — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Andant scores higher on dominance, honours. Amertil leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Amertil: 77.6, Andant: 77.5.
Make your case for Amertil vs Andant. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.