Who is better, Ohuruogu or Berezhna?
Christine Ohuruogu leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.8 for Larysa Berezhna — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Christine Ohuruogu and Larysa Berezhna level at 80.8. Christine Ohuruogu leads on Dominance, Peak. Larysa Berezhna leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ohuruogu wins: Dominance, Peak
Berezhna wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/christine-ohuruogu-vs-larysa-berezhna
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ohuruogu leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Ohuruogu | 0 | 0 | 60 | 130 | 302 | 698 |
| 🇺🇦 Berezhna | 0 | 0 | 52 | 112 | 338 | 661 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OhuruoguRetired | BerezhnaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| Commonwealth Games golds | 1 | — |
| British record 400 m | 49.41 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| European indoor medals | — | 1 |
| Personal best (m) | — | 7.24 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| National titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 84 |
Christine Ohuruogu leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.8 for Larysa Berezhna — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Berezhna scores higher on statistics. Ohuruogu leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ohuruogu: 80.8, Berezhna: 80.8.
Make your case for Ohuruogu vs Berezhna. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.