AthletesTeams
Sinclair vs Buchanan
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SinclairWinner
89.7Sinclair wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Buchanan
87.6Buchanan wins: Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/christine-sinclair-vs-kadeisha-buchanan-v
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Christine Sinclair
89.7
Sinclair leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Christine Sinclair
2. Kadeisha Buchanan
Category breakdown
Season form · Goals per season
Career timeline · Goals per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Goals per season1. 🇨🇦 Kadeisha Buchanan5 seasons played · career day 1,825325 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Christine Sinclair5 seasons played · career day 1,82642 goals
-87.1% vs Buchanan at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Sinclair | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 33 | 89 |
| 🇨🇦 Buchanan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 325 | 675 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SinclairRetired | BuchananActive |
|---|---|---|
| International goals | 190 | — |
| Canada caps | 331 | 130 |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| Olympic bronze medals | 2 | — |
| Canadian Player of the Year awards | 14 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 4 |
| French league titles | — | 4 |
| World Cup Best Young Player awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 86 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Sinclair89.7
Buchanan87.6
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sinclair vs Buchanan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.