Who is better, Sinclair or Buchanan?
Christine Sinclair leads with a GOAT score of 89.7 against 87.6 for Kadeisha Buchanan — a gap of 2.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Christine Sinclair above Kadeisha Buchanan: 89.7 vs 87.6. Christine Sinclair leads on Longevity, Statistics, Dominance. Kadeisha Buchanan leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sinclair wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Buchanan wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/christine-sinclair-vs-kadeisha-buchanan-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sinclair leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Sinclair | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 33 | 89 |
| 🇨🇦 Buchanan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 325 | 675 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SinclairRetired | BuchananActive |
|---|---|---|
| International goals | 190 | — |
| Canada caps | 331 | 130 |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| Olympic bronze medals | 2 | — |
| Canadian Player of the Year awards | 14 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 4 |
| French league titles | — | 4 |
| World Cup Best Young Player awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 86 |
Christine Sinclair leads with a GOAT score of 89.7 against 87.6 for Kadeisha Buchanan — a gap of 2.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Buchanan scores higher on peak, honours. Sinclair leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sinclair: 89.7, Buchanan: 87.6.
Make your case for Sinclair vs Buchanan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.