Who is better, Mathewson or Galvin?
Christy Mathewson leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.1 for Pud Galvin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Christy Mathewson and Pud Galvin level at 89.1. Christy Mathewson leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Pud Galvin leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mathewson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Galvin wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/christy-mathewson-vs-pud-galvin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mathewson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Mathewson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 97 | 211 |
| 🇺🇸 Galvin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 177 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Christy Mathewson leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.1 for Pud Galvin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Galvin scores higher on statistics, longevity. Mathewson leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mathewson: 89.1, Galvin: 89.1.
Make your case for Mathewson vs Galvin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.