GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

McKinley vs Gregory

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GregoryWinner
78.2

Gregory wins: Longevity

McKinley
78.0

McKinley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/chuck-mckinley-vs-colin-gregory

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Colin Gregory
78.2

Gregory leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories. Australian champion in 1929 and later a Wimbledon chairman.

1. Colin Gregory
78.2
2. Chuck McKinley
78.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Chuck McKinley5 seasons played · career day 2,19119 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Colin Gregory5 seasons played · career day 2,1908 titles
-57.9% vs McKinley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 McKinley00021525
🇬🇧 Gregory0001711

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMcKinleyRetiredGregoryRetired
Grand Slam singles titles11
Davis Cup titles1
Grand Slam doubles titles1
Career-high ranking1
Davis Cup match wins29
Davis Cup ties10
Wimbledon doubles finals1
British titles4
Career span in years28
Dominance w25%7466
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%6688
Honours w20%7874
Statistics w15%8278

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gregory78.2
McKinley78.0
The people
McKinley
Gregory

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for McKinley vs Gregory. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →