Who is better, McKinley or Djokovic?
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 78.0 for Chuck McKinley — a gap of 19.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Novak Djokovic above Chuck McKinley: 97.6 vs 78.0. Novak Djokovic leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Djokovic wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
McKinley wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/chuck-mckinley-vs-djokovic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Djokovic leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for McKinley — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | McKinleyRetired | DjokovicActive |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 1 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 1 | — |
| Davis Cup match wins | 29 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 24 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 428 |
| Masters 1000 titles | — | 40 |
| Career titles | — | 99 |
| Match win % | — | 83.2% |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | — | 8 |
| Olympic gold | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 99 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 97 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 99 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 96 |
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 78.0 for Chuck McKinley — a gap of 19.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McKinley does not lead any of the five categories; Djokovic is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McKinley: 78.0, Djokovic: 97.6.
Make your case for McKinley vs Djokovic. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.