GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Curley vs Borgqvist

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CurleyWinner
79.3

Curley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Borgqvist
79.3

Borgqvist wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/cindy-curley-vs-anna-borgqvist

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Cindy Curley
79.3

Curley leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Scored 11 goals at the first women's World Championship in 1990.

1. Cindy Curley
79.3
2. Anna Borgqvist
79.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇺🇸 Cindy Curley5 seasons played · career day 2,19085 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Anna Borgqvist5 seasons played · career day 2,55659 points
-30.6% vs Curley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Curley000127185
🇸🇪 Borgqvist00003086

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCurleyRetiredBorgqvistRetired
World Championship medals1
Goals at 1990 Worlds11
Points at 1990 Worlds23
USA caps30
Hall of Fame inductions1
Olympic appearances3
World Championship appearances8
Sweden caps170
SDHL titles2
Sweden career goals50
Dominance w25%8072
Peak w20%9486
Longevity w20%6084
Honours w20%7872
Statistics w15%8686

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Curley79.3
Borgqvist79.3
The people
Curley
Borgqvist

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Curley vs Borgqvist. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →