GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Curley vs Rask

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CurleyWinner
79.3

Curley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Rask
79.0

Rask wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/cindy-curley-vs-fanny-rask

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Cindy Curley
79.3

Curley leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Scored 11 goals at the first women's World Championship in 1990.

1. Cindy Curley
79.3
2. Fanny Rask
79.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇺🇸 Cindy Curley5 seasons played · career day 2,19085 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Fanny Rask5 seasons played · career day 2,55680 points
-5.9% vs Curley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Curley000127185
🇸🇪 Rask000036130

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCurleyRetiredRaskRetired
World Championship medals1
Goals at 1990 Worlds11
Points at 1990 Worlds23
USA caps30
Hall of Fame inductions1
Olympic appearances3
World Championship appearances8
Sweden caps160
SDHL titles2
SDHL points280
Dominance w25%8072
Peak w20%9486
Longevity w20%6084
Honours w20%7872
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Curley79.3
Rask79.0
The people
Curley
Rask

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Curley vs Rask. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →