Who is better, Taylor or Schutt?
Claire Taylor leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.2 for Megan Schutt — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Taylor vs Schutt
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Claire Taylor and Megan Schutt level at 89.2. Claire Taylor leads on Peak. Megan Schutt leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
TaylorWinner
89.2Taylor wins: Peak
Schutt
89.2Schutt wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/claire-taylor-vs-megan-schutt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Claire Taylor
89.2
Taylor leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Claire Taylor
2. Megan Schutt
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Claire Taylor5 years played · career day 1,825194 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Megan Schutt5 years played · career day 2,191108 runs
-44.3% vs Taylor at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Taylor | 0 | 0 | 28 | 62 | 194 | 422 |
| 🇦🇺 Schutt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 52 | 202 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Taylor89.2
Schutt89.2
FAQ
Where does Schutt beat Taylor?
Schutt scores higher on honours. Taylor leads on peak.
How is the Taylor vs Schutt score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Taylor: 89.2, Schutt: 89.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Taylor vs Schutt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.