Who is better, Drake or Fetisov?
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 87.3 for Clare Drake — a gap of 4.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Viacheslav Fetisov above Clare Drake: 92.1 vs 87.3. Viacheslav Fetisov leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Clare Drake leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fetisov wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Drake wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/clare-drake-vs-viacheslav-fetisov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fetisov leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Drake — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Drake | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 68 | 153 |
| 🇷🇺 Fetisov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DrakeRetired | FetisovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| University national titles | 6 | — |
| University coaching wins | 697 | — |
| Conference titles | 17 | — |
| Olympic teams coached | 1 | — |
| Seasons as a head coach | 28 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 7 |
| Stanley Cups | — | 2 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 13 |
| Golden Stick awards | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 87.3 for Clare Drake — a gap of 4.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Drake scores higher on longevity. Fetisov leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Drake: 87.3, Fetisov: 92.1.
Make your case for Drake vs Fetisov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.