GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Seedorf vs Zamora

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SeedorfWinner
84.9

Seedorf wins: Longevity, Honours

Zamora
84.8

Zamora wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/clarence-seedorf-vs-ricardo-zamora

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇱 Clarence Seedorf
84.9

Seedorf leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. The only player to win the Champions League with three different clubs.

1. Clarence Seedorf
84.9
2. Ricardo Zamora
84.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇪🇸 Ricardo Zamora5 seasons played · career day 3,28770 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇱 Clarence Seedorf5 seasons played · career day 1,82631 goals
-55.7% vs Zamora at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇳🇱 Seedorf00262557
🇪🇸 Zamora0000070

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSeedorfRetiredZamoraRetired
Champions League titles4
Netherlands caps87
Serie A titles2
Club World Cup titles1
Career club appearances878
La Liga titles2
Copa del Rey titles6
Spain caps46
Olympic medals1
Zamora Trophy wins1
Dominance w25%8284
Peak w20%8490
Longevity w20%9084
Honours w20%8882
Statistics w15%8084

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Seedorf84.9
Zamora84.8
The people
Seedorf
Zamora

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Seedorf vs Zamora. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →