Who is better, Shields or García?
Claressa Shields leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Danny García — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Claressa Shields and Danny García level at 83.6. Claressa Shields leads on Dominance, Honours. Danny García leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Shields wins: Dominance, Honours
García wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/claressa-shields-vs-danny-garcia
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Shields leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Shields | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 🇺🇸 García | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 30 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShieldsActive | GarcíaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Undisputed titles | 3 | — |
| World titles | 12 | — |
| Career wins | 16 | — |
| Career defeats | 0 | — |
| Weight classes | 4 | — |
| World titles won | — | 4 |
| Professional wins | — | 37 |
| Knockout wins | — | 21 |
| Professional losses | — | 3 |
| Weight classes with world titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Claressa Shields leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Danny García — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
García scores higher on statistics, longevity. Shields leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Shields: 83.6, García: 83.6.
Make your case for Shields vs García. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.