Who is better, Humphrey or Greene?
Claude Humphrey leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.1 for Joe Greene — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Claude Humphrey and Joe Greene level at 86.1. Claude Humphrey leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity. Joe Greene leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Humphrey wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Greene wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/claude-humphrey-vs-joe-greene
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Humphrey leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Humphrey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 246 | 679 |
| 🇺🇸 Greene | 0 | 0 | 8 | 17 | 46 | 73 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HumphreyRetired | GreeneRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 6 | 10 |
| Unofficial career sacks | 122 | — |
| Defensive Rookie of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| All-Pro selections | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 13 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 4 |
| Defensive Player of the Year | — | 2 |
| All-Pro First Teams | — | 4 |
| Career sacks | — | 78.5 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Claude Humphrey leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.1 for Joe Greene — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Greene scores higher on dominance, honours. Humphrey leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Humphrey: 86.1, Greene: 86.1.
Make your case for Humphrey vs Greene. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.