Who is better, Humphrey or Strahan?
Claude Humphrey leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.0 for Michael Strahan — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Claude Humphrey above Michael Strahan: 86.1 vs 86.0. Claude Humphrey leads on Dominance, Peak. Michael Strahan leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Humphrey wins: Dominance, Peak
Strahan wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/claude-humphrey-vs-michael-strahan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Humphrey leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Humphrey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 246 | 679 |
| 🇺🇸 Strahan | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.5 | 32 | 84.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HumphreyRetired | StrahanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 6 | 7 |
| Unofficial career sacks | 122 | — |
| Defensive Rookie of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| All-Pro selections | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 13 | — |
| Single-season sacks record | — | 22.5 |
| Career sacks | — | 141.5 |
| Defensive Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 1 |
| Forced fumbles | — | 24 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
Claude Humphrey leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.0 for Michael Strahan — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Strahan scores higher on honours, longevity. Humphrey leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Humphrey: 86.1, Strahan: 86.0.
Make your case for Humphrey vs Strahan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.