Who is better, Marchisio or Keßler?
Claudio Marchisio leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.5 for Nadine Keßler — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Claudio Marchisio and Nadine Keßler level at 83.5. Claudio Marchisio leads on Longevity. Nadine Keßler leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Marchisio wins: Longevity
Keßler wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/claudio-marchisio-v-vs-nadine-kessler
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Marchisio leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Marchisio | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 310 | 652 |
| 🇩🇪 Keßler | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 319 | 672 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MarchisioRetired | KeßlerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Serie A titles | 7 | — |
| Coppa Italia titles | 4 | — |
| Italy caps | 55 | — |
| Career appearances | 400 | — |
| Champions League finals | 1 | — |
| FIFA World Player awards | — | 1 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 3 |
| Germany caps | — | 45 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Claudio Marchisio leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.5 for Nadine Keßler — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Keßler scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Marchisio leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Marchisio: 83.5, Keßler: 83.5.
Make your case for Marchisio vs Keßler. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.