Who is better, Kershaw or Gibson?
Clayton Kershaw leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Josh Gibson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Clayton Kershaw and Josh Gibson level at 87.8. Clayton Kershaw leads on Longevity, Honours. Josh Gibson leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kershaw wins: Longevity, Honours
Gibson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/clayton-kershaw-vs-josh-gibson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kershaw leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Kershaw | 0 | 0 | 4.26 | 7.05 | 12.24 | 22.19 |
| 🇺🇸 Gibson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.098 | 2.573 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KershawActive | GibsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Cy Young Awards | 3 | — |
| League MVP awards | 1 | — |
| World Series titles | 2 | — |
| ERA titles | 5 | — |
| Career strikeouts | 3,000 | — |
| Career batting average | — | 0.372 |
| Negro League titles | — | 9 |
| Home run titles | — | 6 |
| Batting titles | — | 4 |
| All-Star selections | — | 12 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 94 |
Clayton Kershaw leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Josh Gibson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gibson scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Kershaw leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kershaw: 87.8, Gibson: 87.8.
Make your case for Kershaw vs Gibson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.