Who is better, Battles or Aikman?
Troy Aikman leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 80.6 for Cliff Battles — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Troy Aikman above Cliff Battles: 81.4 vs 80.6. Troy Aikman leads on Longevity, Honours. Cliff Battles leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Aikman wins: Longevity, Honours
Battles wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/cliff-battles-vs-troy-aikman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Aikman leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Battles | 0 | 0 | 60 | 127 | 283 | 468 |
| 🇺🇸 Aikman | 0 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 69 | 129 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BattlesRetired | AikmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL titles | 1 | — |
| Rushing titles | 2 | — |
| First-team All-Pro selections | 3 | — |
| Career rushing yards | 3,622 | — |
| Seasons played | 6 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 3 |
| Super Bowl MVP | — | 1 |
| Pro Bowls | — | 6 |
| Passing yards | — | 32,942 |
| Playoff wins | — | 11 |
| Touchdown passes | — | 165 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Troy Aikman leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 80.6 for Cliff Battles — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Battles scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Aikman leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Battles: 80.6, Aikman: 81.4.
Make your case for Battles vs Aikman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.