Who is better, Hagan or Guerin?
Cliff Hagan leads with a GOAT score of 81.7 against 81.6 for Richie Guerin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hagan vs Guerin
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cliff Hagan above Richie Guerin: 81.7 vs 81.6. Cliff Hagan leads on Honours. Richie Guerin leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HaganWinner
81.7Hagan wins: Honours
Guerin
81.6Guerin wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BasketballShareable URL · /compare/cliff-hagan-vs-richie-guerin
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Cliff Hagan
81.7
Hagan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Cliff Hagan
2. Richie Guerin
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Cliff Hagan5 seasons played · career day 1,82696 points per game
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Richie Guerin5 seasons played · career day 1,82677.4 points per game
-19.4% vs Hagan at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hagan | 0 | 0 | 5.5 | 25.4 | 73.9 | 173.2 |
| 🇺🇸 Guerin | 0 | 0 | 4.9 | 16.8 | 55.6 | 160.3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hagan81.7
Guerin81.6
FAQ
Where does Guerin beat Hagan?
Guerin scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hagan leads on honours.
How is the Hagan vs Guerin score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hagan: 81.7, Guerin: 81.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hagan vs Guerin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.