Who is better, Lloyd or Sobers?
Garry Sobers leads with a GOAT score of 92.7 against 91.7 for Clive Lloyd — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Lloyd vs Sobers
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Garry Sobers above Clive Lloyd: 92.7 vs 91.7. Garry Sobers leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Clive Lloyd leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SobersWinner
92.7Sobers wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Lloyd
91.7Lloyd wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/clive-lloyd-vs-garry-sobers
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇧 Garry Sobers
92.7
Sobers leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Garry Sobers
2. Clive Lloyd
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇧🇧 Garry Sobers5 years played · career day 2,190267 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Clive Lloyd5 years played · career day 2,92121 runs
-92.1% vs Sobers at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Lloyd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 25 |
| 🇧🇧 Sobers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 195 | 460 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Sobers92.7
Lloyd91.7
FAQ
Where does Lloyd beat Sobers?
Lloyd scores higher on honours, longevity. Sobers leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Lloyd vs Sobers score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lloyd: 91.7, Sobers: 92.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Lloyd vs Sobers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.